As technology has progressed, the concept of transferring the human consciousness from the human body to a maintainable mechanical one has begun to seem realistic for the near future. The morality of such a process had, of course, been disputed. One of the main arguments I have encountered is that leaving the human body for an improved form interferes with \”God\’s plan\” and that humans were created perfect. It seems to me that this is not correct. For the first, a lesser being cannot interfere with the plans of an omnipotent being, so there is no harm in attempting to do so. As for the issue of humans being perfect, it seems to me that the prefect creation would be one which begins in a flawed form and improves itself until it becomes as perfect, or nearly as perfect, as its creator. As the creator/God in question here, what is your take on all this?
by Zeta Nine
WOW! Are you sure you are not me? Wait while I look in a mirror. . . . No, I’m still me, but you are sounding more and more like me. I think you have an incredible understand of how things work, or at least, how they are supposed to work.
Perfection can be a simple state of mind, and like most things with free will, is in the eye of the beholder. Mankind’s free will has allowed for the advancement of technology and no reason why it should not be put to use to further advance mankind.
As for a ‘lesser being’ interfering with higher plans, that supposes that the higher being plans were of the definite, unmoved mover variety. I assure you that my ‘plans’ were more absent than present. I prefer to sit back and see what you ‘lesser beings’ come up with. It sure beats HD TV.
I say keep up the good work and best of luck to one and all.
Keep holding those Zetas. Perhaps yours were American and now with the dollar in decline your face value has gone with it?
One more,
God
Leave a Comment